<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three Things to Read About Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crackunit.com/2009/07/15/three-things-to-read-about-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crackunit.com/2009/07/15/three-things-to-read-about-twitter/</link>
	<description>iain tait&#039;s blog about things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:22:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.crackunit.com/2009/07/15/three-things-to-read-about-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-23185</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crackunit.com/?p=1801#comment-23185</guid>
		<description>@Si Mack - You might find this short post by Mike Arauz affirming:

http://www.mikearauz.com/2009/07/facebookcom-is-not-important.html

@Vic @Graham.Creative.me - Adovocates and contrarians alike acknowledge Twitter as a communication &#039;phenomenon&#039; by focusing on it so much.

So whether you like the service/ brand or not, Twitter is contributing to a shift in the perception of how we can, or should, communicate. 

That alone (IMHO) makes it well worth exploring and understanding.

Nice post, Iain. Or should that be &#039;Nice post @iaintait&#039; ...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Si Mack &#8211; You might find this short post by Mike Arauz affirming:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mikearauz.com/2009/07/facebookcom-is-not-important.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mikearauz.com/2009/07/facebookcom-is-not-important.html</a></p>
<p>@Vic @Graham.Creative.me &#8211; Adovocates and contrarians alike acknowledge Twitter as a communication &#8216;phenomenon&#8217; by focusing on it so much.</p>
<p>So whether you like the service/ brand or not, Twitter is contributing to a shift in the perception of how we can, or should, communicate. </p>
<p>That alone (IMHO) makes it well worth exploring and understanding.</p>
<p>Nice post, Iain. Or should that be &#8216;Nice post @iaintait&#8217; &#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Si Mack</title>
		<link>http://www.crackunit.com/2009/07/15/three-things-to-read-about-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-23181</link>
		<dc:creator>Si Mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crackunit.com/?p=1801#comment-23181</guid>
		<description>well no surprise the comments on the Guardian are fairly well filled with cynical bashing. I think with Twitter (and Facebook et al) a lot of people get stuck at the brand name thing and don&#039;t get the wider implications, or even just the simple thing; that all any of these are really is platforms to talk, whether that&#039;s play or whether that&#039;s communicating important information. People tend to do both those things frequently &#039;in real life&#039;, why would any extension of that into the network be any different?

Its the principal of connectedness that has now become an indisputable fact of life, and I look forward to a time when it&#039;s split between more small applications camouflaged into the normal flow of people&#039;s lives and the devices they use, not platform specific, not brand-name specific, and people will stop focusing on &#039;Twitter&#039; &amp; &#039;Facebnook&#039; etc etc as objects of their anti-everything wrath</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well no surprise the comments on the Guardian are fairly well filled with cynical bashing. I think with Twitter (and Facebook et al) a lot of people get stuck at the brand name thing and don&#8217;t get the wider implications, or even just the simple thing; that all any of these are really is platforms to talk, whether that&#8217;s play or whether that&#8217;s communicating important information. People tend to do both those things frequently &#8216;in real life&#8217;, why would any extension of that into the network be any different?</p>
<p>Its the principal of connectedness that has now become an indisputable fact of life, and I look forward to a time when it&#8217;s split between more small applications camouflaged into the normal flow of people&#8217;s lives and the devices they use, not platform specific, not brand-name specific, and people will stop focusing on &#8216;Twitter&#8217; &amp; &#8216;Facebnook&#8217; etc etc as objects of their anti-everything wrath</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My twitter is blogged re-twittered and re-blogged &#171; Graham.Creative.</title>
		<link>http://www.crackunit.com/2009/07/15/three-things-to-read-about-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-23177</link>
		<dc:creator>My twitter is blogged re-twittered and re-blogged &#171; Graham.Creative.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crackunit.com/?p=1801#comment-23177</guid>
		<description>[...] then, an unconnected post on Twitter from Crackunit (aka Iain Tait CD of Poke London) talked about twitter haters, and the fact they&#8217;re largely [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] then, an unconnected post on Twitter from Crackunit (aka Iain Tait CD of Poke London) talked about twitter haters, and the fact they&#8217;re largely [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham.Creative.me</title>
		<link>http://www.crackunit.com/2009/07/15/three-things-to-read-about-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-23176</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham.Creative.me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crackunit.com/?p=1801#comment-23176</guid>
		<description>The trouble is people such as the commentators on  that post, saying it&#039;s crap, ARE doing the thing which Twitter does so well. Engaging people around topics. 

It&#039;s ironic that Twitter has stirred a debate away from twitter, which is then blogged by the haters saying twitters crap, which is then re-twittered and blogged by people who love it.

In summary: They are unknowingly doing the same thing as the people they despise. Social commentary, people voicing opinion. (Albeit a short-sighted and narrow minded one). It&#039;s no different from people nattering at a bus stop or a village post office. Just on a global scale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trouble is people such as the commentators on  that post, saying it&#8217;s crap, ARE doing the thing which Twitter does so well. Engaging people around topics. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s ironic that Twitter has stirred a debate away from twitter, which is then blogged by the haters saying twitters crap, which is then re-twittered and blogged by people who love it.</p>
<p>In summary: They are unknowingly doing the same thing as the people they despise. Social commentary, people voicing opinion. (Albeit a short-sighted and narrow minded one). It&#8217;s no different from people nattering at a bus stop or a village post office. Just on a global scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All Hale</title>
		<link>http://www.crackunit.com/2009/07/15/three-things-to-read-about-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-23173</link>
		<dc:creator>All Hale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crackunit.com/?p=1801#comment-23173</guid>
		<description>The telephone is crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The telephone is crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Here comes my post about Twitter &#171; The way things go</title>
		<link>http://www.crackunit.com/2009/07/15/three-things-to-read-about-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-23172</link>
		<dc:creator>Here comes my post about Twitter &#171; The way things go</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crackunit.com/?p=1801#comment-23172</guid>
		<description>[...] I read on Iain’s marvelous blog about Twitter and a piece in the Guardian and his observation on the comments, and how people think [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I read on Iain’s marvelous blog about Twitter and a piece in the Guardian and his observation on the comments, and how people think [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flo</title>
		<link>http://www.crackunit.com/2009/07/15/three-things-to-read-about-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-23171</link>
		<dc:creator>Flo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crackunit.com/?p=1801#comment-23171</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get how people can think twitter is crap. 
It&#039;s just like saying the telephone is crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get how people can think twitter is crap.<br />
It&#8217;s just like saying the telephone is crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic</title>
		<link>http://www.crackunit.com/2009/07/15/three-things-to-read-about-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-23170</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crackunit.com/?p=1801#comment-23170</guid>
		<description>Or for an alternative view:

http://adcontrarian.blogspot.com/2009/07/skeptics-guide-to-twitter.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or for an alternative view:</p>
<p><a href="http://adcontrarian.blogspot.com/2009/07/skeptics-guide-to-twitter.html" rel="nofollow">http://adcontrarian.blogspot.com/2009/07/skeptics-guide-to-twitter.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
